computer-aided program burncase 3d Search Results


computer-aided program burncase 3d  (RISC Software GmbH)
90
RISC Software GmbH computer-aided program burncase 3d
Representative photograph-assisted tracing in <t>BurnCase</t> <t>3D.</t> A. The posterior torso of a 14-year-old female is shown, superimposed onto a properly fitted and positioned 3D model. B. Partially complete tracing of the burn injury using the photograph as a reference. C. Completed tracing of the burn injury. D. Final depiction of the burn injury to the posterior torso shown on the 3D model alone.
Computer Aided Program Burncase 3d, supplied by RISC Software GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/computer-aided program burncase 3d/product/RISC Software GmbH
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
computer-aided program burncase 3d - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Representative photograph-assisted tracing in BurnCase 3D. A. The posterior torso of a 14-year-old female is shown, superimposed onto a properly fitted and positioned 3D model. B. Partially complete tracing of the burn injury using the photograph as a reference. C. Completed tracing of the burn injury. D. Final depiction of the burn injury to the posterior torso shown on the 3D model alone.

Journal: Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association

Article Title: Accuracy of Currently Used Paper Burn Diagram vs a Three-Dimensional Computerized Model

doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000363

Figure Lengend Snippet: Representative photograph-assisted tracing in BurnCase 3D. A. The posterior torso of a 14-year-old female is shown, superimposed onto a properly fitted and positioned 3D model. B. Partially complete tracing of the burn injury using the photograph as a reference. C. Completed tracing of the burn injury. D. Final depiction of the burn injury to the posterior torso shown on the 3D model alone.

Article Snippet: The present study was conducted to compare currently used paper Lund and Browder diagrams with a computer-aided program, BurnCase 3D (RISC Software GmbH, Hagenberg, Austria), which relies on clinical patient photographs.

Techniques:

Burn classifications per diagram

Journal: Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association

Article Title: Accuracy of Currently Used Paper Burn Diagram vs a Three-Dimensional Computerized Model

doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000363

Figure Lengend Snippet: Burn classifications per diagram

Article Snippet: The present study was conducted to compare currently used paper Lund and Browder diagrams with a computer-aided program, BurnCase 3D (RISC Software GmbH, Hagenberg, Austria), which relies on clinical patient photographs.

Techniques:

Difference in percent burn obtained using Lund and Browder diagrams and BurnCase 3D. Differences are shown for full-thickness burns (Full; −11 ± 5%), partial-thickness burns (Partial; 15 ± 5%), and TBSA burns (4 ± 2%). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (%).

Journal: Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association

Article Title: Accuracy of Currently Used Paper Burn Diagram vs a Three-Dimensional Computerized Model

doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000363

Figure Lengend Snippet: Difference in percent burn obtained using Lund and Browder diagrams and BurnCase 3D. Differences are shown for full-thickness burns (Full; −11 ± 5%), partial-thickness burns (Partial; 15 ± 5%), and TBSA burns (4 ± 2%). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (%).

Article Snippet: The present study was conducted to compare currently used paper Lund and Browder diagrams with a computer-aided program, BurnCase 3D (RISC Software GmbH, Hagenberg, Austria), which relies on clinical patient photographs.

Techniques:

Absolute difference in percent burn obtained using Lund and Browder diagrams and BurnCase 3D. Differences are shown for partial-thickness burns (Partial; 18 ± 4%), full-thickness burns (Full; 17 ± 4%), and TBSA (6 ± 1%). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (%).

Journal: Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association

Article Title: Accuracy of Currently Used Paper Burn Diagram vs a Three-Dimensional Computerized Model

doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000363

Figure Lengend Snippet: Absolute difference in percent burn obtained using Lund and Browder diagrams and BurnCase 3D. Differences are shown for partial-thickness burns (Partial; 18 ± 4%), full-thickness burns (Full; 17 ± 4%), and TBSA (6 ± 1%). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (%).

Article Snippet: The present study was conducted to compare currently used paper Lund and Browder diagrams with a computer-aided program, BurnCase 3D (RISC Software GmbH, Hagenberg, Austria), which relies on clinical patient photographs.

Techniques: